Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379930›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

A deep learning approach for time-consistent cell cycle phase prediction from microscopy data.

Thomas Bonte, Oriane Pourcelot, Adham Safieddine, Floric Slimani, Florian Mueller, Dominique Weil, Edouard Bertrand, Thomas Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tui: A Multigenerational and Expert-Correctable Tracker for Cellular Dynamics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas BonteCenter for Computational Biology, Mines Paris PSL, Paris, France.
Oriane PourcelotIGH, CNRS and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Adham SafieddineDevelopment, Adaptation and Ageing (Dev2A), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Floric SlimaniIGH, CNRS and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0009-0009-4887-9214
Florian MuellerInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Centre de Ressources et Recherches Technologiques, UTechS-PBI, C2RT, Paris, France.
Dominique WeilDevelopment, Adaptation and Ageing (Dev2A), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Edouard BertrandIGH, CNRS and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Thomas WalterCenter for Computational Biology, Mines Paris PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-7879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell cycle is a series of regulated stages during which a cell grows, replicates its DNA, and divides. It consists of four phases - two growth phases (G1 and G2), a replication phase (S), and a division phase (M) - each characterized by distinct transcriptional programs and impacting most other cellular processes. In imaging assays, the cell cycle phase can be identified using specific cell-cycle markers. However, the use of dedicated cell-cycle markers can be impractical or even prohibitive, as they occupy fluorescent channels that may be needed for other reporters. To address this limitation we propose a method to infer the cell cycle phase from a widely used fluorescent reporter: SiR-DNA, thereby bypassing the need for phase-specific markers while leveraging information already present in common experimental setups. Our method is based on a Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE), enhanced with two auxiliary tasks: predicting the average intensity of phase-specific markers and enforcing temporal consistency through latent space regularization. The reconstruction task ensures that the latent space captures cell cycle-relevant features, while the temporal constraint promotes biological plausibility. The resulting model, CC-VAE, classifies cell cycle phases with high accuracy from widely used DNA markers and can thus be applied to high-content screening datasets not specifically designed for cell cycle analysis. CC-VAE is freely available, along with a new, publicly released dataset comprising over 600,000 labeled HeLa Kyoto nuclear images to support further development and benchmarking in the community.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDeep LearningMicroscopyAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHeLa CellsHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID41379930
PMCPMC12711074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.