Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379821›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Barriers and facilitators for self-harm prevention and surveillance: A cross-sectional study with primary health care nurses in Brazil.

Amanda Sarah Vanzela, Laysa Fernanda Silva Pedrollo, Aline Conceição Silva, Isabela Dos Santos Martin, Bruno Pereira da Silva, Maria Aline do Nascimento Brandão Dos Santos, Jeferson Rodrigues, Márcia Astrês Fernandes, Ana Carolina Guidorizzi Zanetti, Bianca Cristina Ciccone Giacon and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amanda Sarah VanzelaDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3535-5621
Laysa Fernanda Silva PedrolloDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Conceição SilvaDepartment of Maternal-Child and Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabela Dos Santos MartinDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Pereira da SilvaMultidisciplinary Centre, Federal University of Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brazil.
Maria Aline do Nascimento Brandão Dos SantosMultidisciplinary Centre, Federal University of Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brazil.
Jeferson RodriguesDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Márcia Astrês FernandesDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Guidorizzi ZanettiDepartment of Maternal-Child and Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-4510
Bianca Cristina Ciccone GiaconIntegrated Health Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Guilherme Oliveira de ArrudaIntegrated Health Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.
Kelly Graziani Giacchero VedanaDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing and Human Sciences, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most individuals who die by suicide do not have contact with specialised mental health services; instead, they engage with primary health care services. This highlights the critical role of primary care in preventing self-harm and suicide. The objective of this study was to identify the barriers, facilitators, and associated factors influencing suicide and self-harm prevention and surveillance from the perspective of primary care nurses. This cross-sectional observational study used a quantitative approach and included 125 nurses from the five macro-regions of Brazil. Data concerning barriers and facilitators to self-harm prevention and surveillance, along with associated factors, were collected online using a data capture software. Instruments were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, developed and validated for the Brazilian context. Data analysis was performed using Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), with distribution selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Generalised AIC (GAIC). Analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.1) with a significance level of 5%. In terms of self-harm prevention, "knowledge and skills" was identified as a facilitator (58.1%), while "context" (75.7%) and "reinforcement" (91.7%) were recognised as barriers. For self-harm surveillance, "reinforcement" (89.8%) and "intentions" (56.5%) were identified as barriers, whereas facilitators included "knowledge and skills" (61.7%), "beliefs about consequences" (82.9%), "emotions" (55.8%), and "behavioural regulation" (61.4%). Identifying barriers and facilitators within healthcare is crucial for implementing evidence-based practices. The findings of this study can contribute to the development of more tailored self-harm prevention strategies across different regions of Brazil.

Indexed as

NursesPrimary Care NursingSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicide PreventionAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID41379821
PMCPMC12697949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.