Observational studyPloS one2025
Barriers and facilitators for self-harm prevention and surveillance: A cross-sectional study with primary health care nurses in Brazil.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most individuals who die by suicide do not have contact with specialised mental health services; instead, they engage with primary health care services. This highlights the critical role of primary care in preventing self-harm and suicide. The objective of this study was to identify the barriers, facilitators, and associated factors influencing suicide and self-harm prevention and surveillance from the perspective of primary care nurses. This cross-sectional observational study used a quantitative approach and included 125 nurses from the five macro-regions of Brazil. Data concerning barriers and facilitators to self-harm prevention and surveillance, along with associated factors, were collected online using a data capture software. Instruments were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, developed and validated for the Brazilian context. Data analysis was performed using Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), with distribution selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Generalised AIC (GAIC). Analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.1) with a significance level of 5%. In terms of self-harm prevention, "knowledge and skills" was identified as a facilitator (58.1%), while "context" (75.7%) and "reinforcement" (91.7%) were recognised as barriers. For self-harm surveillance, "reinforcement" (89.8%) and "intentions" (56.5%) were identified as barriers, whereas facilitators included "knowledge and skills" (61.7%), "beliefs about consequences" (82.9%), "emotions" (55.8%), and "behavioural regulation" (61.4%). Identifying barriers and facilitators within healthcare is crucial for implementing evidence-based practices. The findings of this study can contribute to the development of more tailored self-harm prevention strategies across different regions of Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.