ArticlePloS one2025
Do 'leaders' in change sound different from 'laggers'? The perceptual similarity of New Zealand English voices.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Work on covariation in New Zealand English has revealed groups of speakers characterised by their back vowel spaces and status as 'leaders' or 'laggers' across a set of ongoing vowel changes. We investigate whether listeners hear speakers from different groups as perceptually distinct. We conduct a perception task in which New Zealanders rate the similarity of pairs of speakers. We use the results to create a two-dimensional perceptual similarity space by means of Multi-Dimensional Scaling, and test if speakers are organised within this space according to their back vowels, leader-lagger status, speed, or mean pitch. Results indicate higher pitched and faster speakers are perceptually distinct from lower pitched and slower speakers. Leaders are perceptually distinct from laggers if they are not markedly higher pitched. A Generalised Additive Mixed Model fit to the trial-by-trial ratings shows order effects, revealing that perception of similarity is not symmetrical. They also support the perceptual relevance of speaker speed, pitch and leader-lagger status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.