Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379773›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

M-polynomial driven machine learning models for predicting physicochemical properties of antibiotics.

Xin Li, Masoud Ghods, Negar Kheirkhahan, Jana Shafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin LiDepartment of Gynecology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Masoud GhodsDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Semnan University, Semnan-19111, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-5107
Negar KheirkhahanDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Semnan University, Semnan-19111, Iran.
Jana ShafiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Information, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Alddawasir, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the physicochemical properties of drug compounds is critical for the development of effective and safe antibiotics. In this study, we employ advanced machine learning techniques to address this challenge, using input data that includes M-Polynomials and various physicochemical descriptors. Three models were implemented: basic Support Vector Regression (SVR-Basic), optimized SVR (SVR-Tuned), and Random Forest (RF), trained on known compounds and tested on previously unseen drug samples to evaluate generalization. Model performance was comprehensively assessed using R2, MSE, RMSE, and MAE, alongside detailed error and residual analyses to ensure precision and robustness. Furthermore, residual-based metrics such as the Mean Residual (MR), Standard Deviation of Residuals (Std Residual), and Interquartile Range (IQR) of Residuals were employed to provide complementary insights into prediction bias, consistency, and robustness. By integrating feature importance analysis and ablation studies, the contribution of each molecular descriptor was systematically evaluated, providing deep insights into model stability and the key factors affecting predictive accuracy. Visual comparisons further illustrated the models' behavior on training and test datasets. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach not only improves predictive accuracy compared to prior studies but also offers a robust and reliable framework for real-world drug development. All models were implemented in Python 3.12.7, highlighting the practical applicability of machine learning in pharmaceutical research.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41379773
PMCPMC12724536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.