Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379755›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Outcomes for patients implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator at <19 years of age: a Swedish national study.

Camilla Wirestrand, Fredrik Gadler, Annika Rydberg, Anders Nygren, André Rudolph, Anna Wålinder Österberg, Eva Fernlund, Ida Jeremiasen, Ingegerd Östman-Smith, Jenny Alenius Dahlqvist and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Camilla WirestrandDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavãgen 18A, 17177 Solna, Sweden.
Fredrik GadlerDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1027-9434
Annika RydbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9655-7783
Anders NygrenDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0810-7016
André RudolphDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavãgen 18A, 17177 Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0003-3311-8224
Anna Wålinder ÖsterbergCrown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-296X
Eva FernlundCrown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-9411
Ida JeremiasenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-4759
Ingegerd Östman-SmithDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2445-9230
Jenny Alenius DahlqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-8762
Håkan EliassonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavãgen 18A, 17177 Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1565-8385

Funding

Samariten FoundationSwedish ICD and Pacemaker Registry
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the prevalence and incidence of paediatric implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients in Sweden and identify risk factors associated with appropriate shocks and adverse events. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a nationwide, retrospective cohort study of ICD use in paediatric patients (<19 years) between 1995 and 2017; 120 patients underwent ICD implantation at median age 14.7 (range 1.1-18.9) years and were followed for 7.1 (0.3-20.4) years. Fifty-four patients (45%) received a primary preventive ICD; 46% had cardiomyopathy, and 41% had primary electrical disease. The estimated 5-year survival without appropriate shocks was 68% (confidence interval 59-78). Secondary preventive ICDs and lower weight (<30 kg) at implantation were associated with a higher rate of appropriate shocks, respectively. Lower weight at implantation was not a risk factor for adverse events. Inadequate medication and insufficient compliance were common in patients who experienced shocks. Less than half (46%) of the cases with inappropriate shocks were adequately medicated with good compliance. Secondly, an incidence and prevalence study of all paediatric and adult patients who had an ICD implanted in Sweden was analysed in 4-year periods between 2002 and 2021. The incidence of paediatric ICD implantations in Sweden peaked at 0.56 per 100 000 person-years in 2010-13, decreasing to 0.45 per 100 000 person-years in the last study period (2018-21).

conclusionAppropriate shocks were more than twice as common in the youngest patient group, whereas adverse events were not more frequent than in the older patient group. Inadequate medication and lack of compliance were common in connection with ICD shocks.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMalePrevalencePrimary PreventionRetrospective StudiesCardiac arrhythmiasChildrenImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID41379755
PMCPMC12849815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.