ReviewNephron2026
Kidney Transplantation in the Era of Climate Change: Environmental, Structural, and Ethical Implications for Future-Ready Practice.
Review in Nephron, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No more waiting: 10 tips to turn kidney transplantation green.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Background: Kidney transplantation and dialysis are the two main modalities of kidney replacement therapy, and both are increasingly challenged by the current climate emergency landscape. Dialysis has long been scrutinised for its high energy and water demands, but transplantation, while generally more sustainable over the long term, also warrants critical evaluation concerning environmental accountability, equity, and resilience. Summary: In this review, we compare the environmental and structural dimensions of dialysis and transplantation, while examining how climate change uniquely affects transplant recipients and grafts. We highlight the vulnerabilities of immunosuppressed recipients to heat stress and infectious diseases, the risks of cold chain disruption for organ preservation and shipment, and the impact of graft failure necessitating return to dialysis. We then consider how green nephrology principles can be applied to transplantation, drawing on emerging UK data, global policy frameworks such as the European Green Deal, and lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Digital healthcare solutions such as hybrid virtual clinics are explored as tangible strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of follow-up care. Recent life-cycle analyses also provide comparative estimates of dialysis and transplantation emissions, underscoring the importance of nuanced evaluation of both modalities. Key Messages: We conclude with a forward-looking agenda for clinicians and policymakers to embed environmental and social responsibility into both dialysis and transplantation, ensuring that kidney replacement therapy as a whole is resilient and sustainable in a warming world. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.