Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379547›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality aversion can be taught through learning of others' preferences.

Shen Zhang, Oriel FeldmanHall, Sébastien Hétu, A Ross Otto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-286X
Oriel FeldmanHallCognitive, Linguistics and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0726-3861
Sébastien HétuDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5323-931X
A Ross OttoDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9997-1901

Funding

European Union 101041799Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies New Researchers Startup GrantNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While enforcing egalitarian social norms is critical for human society, punishing social norm violators often incurs a cost to the self. This cost looms even larger when one can benefit from an unequal distribution of resources, a phenomenon known as advantageous inequity-for example, receiving a higher salary than a colleague with the identical role. In the Ultimatum Game, a classic testbed for fairness norm enforcement, individuals rarely reject (or punish) such unequal proposed divisions of resources because doing so entails a sacrifice of one's own benefit. Recent work has demonstrated that observing and implementing another's punitive responses to unfairness can efficiently alter the punitive preferences of an observer. It remains an open question, however, whether such contagion is powerful enough to impart advantageous inequity aversion to individuals-that is, can observing another's preferences to punish inequity result in increased enforcement of equality norms, even in the difficult case of Advantageous inequity? Using a variant of the Ultimatum Game in which participants are tasked with responding to fairness violations on behalf of another 'Teacher'-whose aversion to advantageous (versus disadvantageous) inequity was systematically manipulated-we probe whether individuals subsequently increase their punishment unfairly after experiencing fairness violations on their own behalf. In two experiments, we found individuals can acquire aversion to advantageous inequity through observing (and implementing) the Teacher's preferences. Computationally, these learning effects were best characterized by a model which learns the latent structure of the Teacher's preferences, rather than a simple Reinforcement Learning account. In summary, our study is the first to demonstrate that people can swiftly and readily acquire another's preferences for advantageous inequity, suggesting in turn that behavioral contagion may be one promising mechanism through which social norm enforcement-which people rarely implement in the case of advantageous inequality-can be enhanced.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorLearningSocial BehaviorSocial NormsAdultFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansMalePunishmentYoung Adultfairnesshumanlearningmodelingphysics of living systems

Identifiers

PMID41379547
PMCPMC12698084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.