ArticleJAMA network open2025
Subsequent Meningiomas Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Errors in Key Points, Abstract, Results, and Discussion.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Associations with chemotherapy, occurrence of multiple meningiomas, and mortality after subsequent meningioma diagnosis among survivors of childhood cancer remain unclear. Objectives: To report the incidence of meningioma among childhood cancer survivors, identify novel risk factors for meningiomas, characterize survivors with multiple meningiomas, and describe cause-specific mortality following meningioma occurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study is a retrospective cohort study with longitudinal prospective follow-up of childhood cancer survivors diagnosed between 1970 to 1999 in the US and Canada. Eligibility included diagnosis of cancer before age 21 years and surviving more than 5 years after diagnosis. Meningiomas were self-reported and confirmed by review of pathology reports. Childhood cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy details, and radiation therapy exposures from up to 5 years from diagnosis were abstracted from medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative incidence of meningioma was calculated starting from 5 years from the diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of the first subsequent meningioma was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: The CCSS cohort included 24 886 survivors initially diagnosed from 1970 to 1999, including 471 survivors (263 female [56%]; median [range] age at last follow-up, 42.5 [19.7-66.3] years; median [range] age at primary cancer diagnosis, 5.6 [0-20.9] years) who were diagnosed with 710 meningiomas. Thirty-five years after primary cancer diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of a subsequent meningioma was 2.3% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.6%). Of the 471 survivors who developed meningioma, 137 (29.0%) had at least 2 meningiomas, and 80 (16%) met criteria for meningiomatosis. An increased risk of meningioma was associated with higher doses of cranial radiation therapy (eg, HR, 125.3 [95% CI, 58.1-270.5]), younger age at primary cancer diagnosis (eg, 0 to 4 years: HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 2.4-6.1]), female sex (HR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]), and exposure to platinum, 6-mercaptopurine, and intrathecal chemotherapy, and a lower risk was associated with non-Hispanic Black race (HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.3-1.0]) and exposure to alkylating agents (HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.8]). The all-cause cumulative mortality was 4.9%, 10.5% and 18.4% at 5, 10, and 15 years from the first subsequent meningioma diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Meningiomas have a relatively high incidence and mortality for childhood cancer survivors. Results from this study could justify screening for meningiomas in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.