Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379403›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Patent Term Extension for Innovative Drugs in China: A Cohort Study from 2021 to 2024.

Xuefang Yao, Yan Zhang, Jin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuefang YaoSchool of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China. sarina_yao@126.com.
Yan ZhangSchool of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jin ZhouSchool of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

Funding

General Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province 2024SJYB0240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn January 2024, China officially implemented the patent term extension (PTE) system, that is, began to implement PTE for innovative drugs approved after June 1, 2021. This study analyzed the PTE system's outcomes in China and its potential impact on drug accessibility.

methodsWe conducted a simulation analysis of the PTE duration and effective patent life after listing (EPLL) of innovative drugs approved by Chinese regulatory authorities from June 2021 to December 2024, using data collected from public databases such as China's marketed drug patent registration platform.

resultsA total of 148 innovative drugs were included in the study. Among them, 61% were able to obtain PTE, with a median PTE duration of 5 years (IQR: 2.3-5). The median EPLL before adding PTE was 9 years (IQR: 6.1-11.7), and the median EPLL after adding PTE was 14 years (IQR: 11.1-14), an increase of 55.6%. Furthermore, the study reveals variations across drug types and therapeutic areas.

conclusionsCompared to findings from prior studies on the U.S. and the European Union, the median PTE duration for innovative drugs in China is longer, while the median EPLL is only marginally extended. Both Chinese domestic stakeholders and foreign enterprises should evaluate the potential impact by considering both the incremental PTE periods and the overall EPLL levels.

Indexed as

Access to medicinesChinaEffective patent life after listingInnovative drugPatent term extension

Identifiers

PMID41379403
PMCPMC12945983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.