ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Interventional endoscopic ultrasound in the hepatopancreatobiliary system : What is possible, what is safe and what is meaningful?]
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become established as an important diagnostic and therapeutic pillar in diseases of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system. It complements or replaces conventional strategies and expands the spectrum of endoscopic procedures but requires a high level of expertise and interdisciplinary interpretation of indications. One focus is the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: The use of EUS-guided drainage is part of the step-up approach and is superior to surgical procedures. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) facilitate the access and enable direct necrosectomy but double pigtail stents also retain their role. Pancreatic pseudocysts and postoperative fluid accumulation can also be effectively drained endoscopically. In complex bile duct stenoses, EUS-guided drainage is a back-up method, for example as a rendezvous technique, hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy, especially when an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not technically possible. Similarly, the pancreatic duct can be reached endosonographically, although EUS-guided drainage is only advisable under strict clinical indications. Gallbladder drainage using LAMS is an alternative to percutaneous drainage in severe cholecystitis without surgical options. The EUS gastroenterostomy is increasingly replacing surgical procedures for the treatment of gastric outlet obstructions and also enables the endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) procedure for easier ERCP in an anatomically altered stomach. Other emerging fields include EUS-guided ablation of small insulinomas, endovascular interventions for portal hypertension and celiac plexus block, although the benefits of the latter are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41379373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.