SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in uncontrolled hypertension: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- When Methods Matter: An Umbrella Review of Lorundrostat and the Impact of Analytical Decisions on Reported Blood Pressure and Safety Outcomes.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in uncontrolled hypertension: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of lorundrostat in uncontrolled hypertension: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension remains a leading global health concern, contributing significantly to cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lorundrostat, a selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor, in adults with uncontrolled hypertension, synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to July 2025. A total of three RCTs comprising 1,567 participants (1,164 receiving lorundrostat and 403 receiving placebo) were included. Lorundrostat significantly reduced office systolic blood pressure compared to placebo (MD: -7.93 mm Hg; 95% CI: -13.62, -2.24; p = 0.006), with no significant impact on office diastolic blood pressure or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. The risk of adverse events was higher with lorundrostat (RR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.67; p < 0.0001), particularly mild adverse events. Lorundrostat demonstrates moderate efficacy in lowering office systolic blood pressure and reducing the incidence of severely elevated blood pressure in adults with uncontrolled hypertension. However, its use is associated with a higher incidence of mild adverse events, hyperkalemia, and hyponatremia. Larger and longer-term trials are warranted to further clarify the role of lorundrostat in hypertension management and to better define its safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41379320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.