ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Block Matching Based Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Clinical Applications and Research Outlook in a Deep Learning Context.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in heart failure.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is effective in assessing cardiac dysfunction in high-risk populations for heart failure. As a fundamental STE technology, speckle tracking methods have been studied for nearly two decades. Over the past decade, the rapid development of AI has led to increasing interest in deep learning-based speckle tracking methods which require large annotated datasets for training. However, the challenge of manually annotating speckle regions in echocardiograms hinders the clinical deployment of those deep learning methods, thereby maintaining the indispensability of traditional speckle tracking methods. This paper presents a clinically applicable speckle tracking method, bidirectional block matching (BiDiBM), which introduces several novel processes to enhance the tracking accuracy and robustness of traditional BM methods. We evaluated BiDiBM for myocardial longitudinal strain (MLS) on an open-source synthetic echocardiographic dataset across four scenarios, comparing its strain measurements against the gold standard using the root mean square error (RMSE) and the zero-lag point (ZERO-LAG) of cross-correlation functions. Mean RMSE values across scenarios ranged from 1.0576 ± 0.2734% to 1.2812 ± 0.4703%, with corresponding ZERO-LAG values ranging from 0.8889 ± 0.1534 to 0.9484 ± 0.0399. In comparison experiments, BiDiBM achieved superior accuracy and efficiency over the conventional BM and the deep-learning comparators. Additionally, we performed a small real-world validation, in which BiDiBM tracked speckle points, and the derived MLS curves had physiologically consistent morphologies and trends on expert review. Overall, results indicate the BiDiBM method exhibits robust accuracy and reliability, thereby confirming its suitability for clinical STE applications and establishing a practical foundation for deploying deep learning-based methods in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41379238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.