Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379238›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Block Matching Based Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Clinical Applications and Research Outlook in a Deep Learning Context.

Yufan Zhao, Guolong Pang, Zhengxiang Sun, Yuhan Liu, Lin Lv, Tianshu Li, Tong Jiang, Zhaoguang Li, Jingjing Xu, Jianping Xing and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yufan Zhao *School of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Guolong Pang *School of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Zhengxiang SunFaculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Yuhan LiuSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Lin LvSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Tianshu LiSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Tong JiangKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zhaoguang LiSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Jingjing XuSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Jianping XingSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China.
Paul BabynDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Guihua YaoDepartment of Cardiology Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266053, China.
Feng-Rong SunSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250101, China. sunfr@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9876-8346

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFB1407001Natural Science Foundation of China 12204273Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019MF048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is effective in assessing cardiac dysfunction in high-risk populations for heart failure. As a fundamental STE technology, speckle tracking methods have been studied for nearly two decades. Over the past decade, the rapid development of AI has led to increasing interest in deep learning-based speckle tracking methods which require large annotated datasets for training. However, the challenge of manually annotating speckle regions in echocardiograms hinders the clinical deployment of those deep learning methods, thereby maintaining the indispensability of traditional speckle tracking methods. This paper presents a clinically applicable speckle tracking method, bidirectional block matching (BiDiBM), which introduces several novel processes to enhance the tracking accuracy and robustness of traditional BM methods. We evaluated BiDiBM for myocardial longitudinal strain (MLS) on an open-source synthetic echocardiographic dataset across four scenarios, comparing its strain measurements against the gold standard using the root mean square error (RMSE) and the zero-lag point (ZERO-LAG) of cross-correlation functions. Mean RMSE values across scenarios ranged from 1.0576 ± 0.2734% to 1.2812 ± 0.4703%, with corresponding ZERO-LAG values ranging from 0.8889 ± 0.1534 to 0.9484 ± 0.0399. In comparison experiments, BiDiBM achieved superior accuracy and efficiency over the conventional BM and the deep-learning comparators. Additionally, we performed a small real-world validation, in which BiDiBM tracked speckle points, and the derived MLS curves had physiologically consistent morphologies and trends on expert review. Overall, results indicate the BiDiBM method exhibits robust accuracy and reliability, thereby confirming its suitability for clinical STE applications and establishing a practical foundation for deploying deep learning-based methods in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Block matchingDeep learningEchocardiographyMyocardial longitudinal strainSpeckle tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.