Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379210›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2025

A control engineering perspective on the advantages of efference copies.

Benjamin P Campbell, Huai-Ti Lin, Holger G Krapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin P CampbellBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK. b.campbell21@imperial.ac.uk.
Huai-Ti LinBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK.
Holger G KrappBioengineering Department, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BX, UK.

Funding

Defence Science and Technology Laboratory,United Kingdom DSTLX1000161145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems have evolved to perform high-speed voluntary movements whilst maintaining robustness and stability. This paper examines a control architecture based on the principles of efference copies found in insect sensorimotor control which we call the fully-separable-degrees-of-freedom (FSDoF) controller. Within a control engineering framework, we benchmark the advantages of this control architecture against two common engineering control schemes: a pure feedback (PFB) controller and a Smith predictor (SP). Our study identifies three advantages of the FSDoF for biology. It is advantageous in controlling systems with sensor delays, and it can effectively handle noise. Thirdly, it allows biological sensors to increase their operating range. We evaluate the robustness of the FSDoF controller and show that it achieves improved performance with equal stability margins and robustness. Finally, we discuss variations of the FSDoF which theoretically provide the same performance.

Indexed as

CyberneticsEngineeringMotionEfference copiesFeedforward controlForward modelsSensorimotor control

Identifiers

PMID41379210
PMCPMC12698751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.