Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379208›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Comparison of clinical findings and lung ultrasound scores in newborns with RSV and non-RSV viral lower respiratory tract infections: a prospective observational study.

Umit Ayşe Tandircioglu, Umran Koral, Sevde Nur Menemen, Serdar Alan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06204367 (Evaluation of Lung Ultrasonography Findings in Newborns With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06204367 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Lung Ultrasonography Findings in Newborns With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKırıkkale UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsRSV Infection, BronchiolitisArmsLung Ultrasonografisi
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umit Ayşe TandirciogluDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey. aysetandrcoglu@gmail.com.
Umran KoralDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Sevde Nur MenemenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Serdar AlanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study compared quantitative lung ultrasound (LUS) findings and LUS aeration scores in neonates with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and those with LRTI due to other viral agents. Also, it was to evaluate the disease progression of all newborns with viral LRTI during their hospital stay at predetermined time points using quantitative LUS findings and aeration scores. This prospective observational study was conducted in the level 3 NICU. Term and late preterm neonates admitted with viral LRTI were included in the study. Viral pathogens were detected by RT-PCR. Quantitative LUS was performed at four time points: admission, at 24 h after admission, clinical deterioration, and discharge. On admission, clinical severity of LRTI (mild, moderate, severe) was assessed. The study was also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06204367). A total of 37 newborns with viral LRTI were evaluated: 20 with RSV and 17 with other viral agents. Normal quantitative LUS findings were more frequent at "discharge" but not significant (p = 0.201). The percentage of pleural line abnormalities was highest at "24th hour" (p = 0.003), and consolidation was more common during "clinical deterioration" (p = 0.026) on quantitative LUS. Moderate disease was more prevalent among the RSV-positive infants (60% vs. 11.8%), while mild disease was more prevalent among the non-RSV cases (64.7% vs. 20%; p = 0.029) according to clinical severity scores at the admission. RSV-positive neonates had significantly higher LUS aeration scores at the admission compared with those with the non-RSV cases (p = 0.008). In all neonates with viral LRTI, LUS aeration scores on admission were moderately correlated with clinical scores (p < 0.01, r:0.555).

conclusionAlthough our sample size was limited, no RSV-specific findings were observed in quantitative lung ultrasound (LUS). However, abnormal quantitative LUS findings and high LUS aeration scores were more frequent in cases of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), which had a more severe course compared to LRTI caused by other viral agents. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Lung ultrasound is a valuable diagnostic tool for lung imaging. • Quantitative LUS could play a role in diagnosing viral LRTI and predicting the need for pediatric intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stays and respiratory support. WHAT IS NEW: • It is the first to evaluate LUS aeration scoring in viral LRTI during the neonatal period. • This study found that neonates with RSV LRTI had significantly higher LUS aeration score and clinical severity scores upon admission to the NICU than those with non-RSV viral agents.

Indexed as

LungRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonographyLung ultrasound scoreNewbornRespiratory syncytial virusViral lower respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.