Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379145›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026

[Advances in ultrasound diagnostics in children with rheumatic diseases].

Daniel Windschall

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel WindschallKlinik für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie, Rheumatologisches Kompetenzzentrum Nordwestdeutschland, St-Josef-Stift Sendenhorst, Westtor 7, 48324, Sendenhorst, Deutschland. windschall@st-josef-stift.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe increasing importance of ultrasound in paediatric rheumatology is reflected in many scientific projects, in the increasing number of training courses and in its everyday use. Several international working groups have been working in the last few years to develop standardised examination protocols for joint sonography. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe article summarises the current progress in ultrasound diagnostics in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases, and discusses technical developments, improved training opportunities, the implementation in the treat-to-target management and the extension to other fields of application in paediatric rheumatology.

resultsTo determine disease activity and to describe pathological findings, sonographic definitions were agreed upon, taking into account age-dependent changes in the musculoskeletal system, and first paediatric scoring systems were tested in validation studies. Several publications in the last few years have shown that joint sonography is superior to clinical examination in certain joint regions. Several studies have also demonstrated its important role in therapy and follow-up monitoring. Even outside of the joint regions, such as in the depiction of salivary glands or muscles, ultrasound is gaining increasing importance in paediatric and adolescent rheumatology.

conclusionAdvances in technical development and expertise in the field of ultrasound have led to ultrasound becoming an important tool in the care of children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases.

Indexed as

Image EnhancementRheumatic DiseasesRheumatologyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleUltrasonographyEnthesitisNormal findingsPediatric rheumatologySynovitisTenosynovitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.