ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2026
Screening Children for Risk of Frequent Substance Use in Young Adulthood: A 17-Year Prospective, National Study.
Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere is no externally validated instrument for predicting which children will show frequent substance use in young adulthood. This study evaluated whether an instrument previously shown to predict substance use outcomes in mid-adolescence could also predict substance use outcomes in young adulthood, comparing performance across ages and demographics.
methodThe Loeber Risk Score (LRS) is a five-item, parent-completed screener indexing risk of future substance use in children. We evaluated the predictive performance of the LRS in a nationally representative longitudinal birth cohort (
resultsThe LRS at age 9 predicted several outcomes at age 22 better than chance (
conclusionsThe LRS would be an improvement over random or ad hoc selection, but screening accuracy is generally low. Much more accurate screeners are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.