ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Efficacy and CNS Toxicity of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Rare Cancer Brain Metastases: A Multicenter Basket Trial Analysis (NCI/SWOG S1609).
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02834013 (DART), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DART: Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with brain metastases (BM) from rare cancers. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with and without BM received nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks; NCI/SWOG S1609 DART trial, NCT02834013) across >1,000 sites. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived from Cox models. Systemic objective response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST version 1.1, and adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Intracranial outcomes were assessed in a subset of patients with BM to evaluate the best intracranial response.
resultsAmong 727 patients, the systemic ORR was 11.5% in those without BM (n = 707) and 10% in those with BM (n = 20; P = 0.76). PFS and OS were similar between groups (PFS: HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81-2.07; P = 0.28; OS: HR = 1.36; 95% CI, 0.81-2.27; P = 0.24). Intracranial response was evaluable in 12 patients with BM (60%). No intracranial complete or partial responses were observed, and six patients (50%) achieved intracranial stable disease as their best intracranial response. Grade ≥3 central nervous system toxicities occurred in 3% of patients without BM and 5% of those with BM (P = 0.43).
conclusionsDual ICI therapy showed comparable efficacy and safety in patients with and without BM. See related commentary by Ricci and Rizzo, p. 1921.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.