ArticleJournal of vision2025
The spatial and temporal properties of the contour erasure effect and perceptual filling-in.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contour erasure describes the phenomenon that after brief flicker adaptation at the edge of an object, the object disappears and is replaced by the background - highlighting the importance of edges in perceiving a surface. The underlying mechanism remains unknown. The current study investigates the characteristics and functional properties of contour erasure, and its relationship with related phenomena such as perceptual filling-in, forward masking, and contrast adaptation. We used a homogeneous disk as a target, and circles that corresponded to the outline of the target disk as the adapter. Using a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) paradigm, each trial began with a counterphase flickering adapter, followed by the target randomly presented in one of the two locations. Participants indicated the target location with a button press. The target detection threshold elevation relative to the no adaptation condition was used as an index of the adaptation effect. We manipulated two spatial properties (eccentricity and the adapter size) plus three temporal properties (adapter flickering rate, adaptation duration, and interstimulus interval [ISI]). Results indicated that the adaptation effect increased with eccentricity, flickering rate (plateauing at 6 hertz [Hz]) and adaptation duration, but decreased with longer ISI and for adapter sizes that were larger than the target. The target threshold first increased then decreased as the adapter size decreased from that of the target, indicating a size tuning that is slightly smaller than the target. Our results indicate that contour erasure shares some of the key features of other well-known perceptual phenomena like filling in and contrast adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.