Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378886›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2025

Development of a novel patient-oriented tool to assess achalasia symptoms and response to treatment (I-PASS, International Patient-oriented tool for Achalasia Symptom Score).

Giovanni Zaninotto, Sheraz R Markar, Rami Sweiss, Renato Salvador, Lorena Torroni, Francesco Casella, Humayra Dervin, Andrea Costantini, Sara Jamel, Michele Sacco and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giovanni ZaninottoDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-9491
Sheraz R MarkarNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8650-2017
Rami SweissGastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Renato SalvadorDepartment of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Lorena TorroniDepartment of Medicine, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CasellaUpper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Humayra DervinGastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Andrea CostantiniDepartment of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Sara JamelDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michele SaccoUpper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
I-PASS Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achalasia treatment outcomes are often assessed using the Eckardt score, which has not been formally validated and is not designed as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool. To address this unmet clinical need, a group of healthcare providers developed the International Patient-oriented tool for Achalasia Symptom Score (I-PASS), which aims to record both symptom severity and frequency in a patient-oriented manner. Using the RAND/ University of California, Los Angeles, Appropriateness Methodology, a 16-member international, multidisciplinary panel identified key symptomatic domains through three Delphi rounds. Dysphagia, regurgitation (daytime and nocturnal), and chest pain were selected as primary domains, with weight loss included as an additional factor. Severity and frequency scoring were agreed upon, resulting in a maximum composite score of 53. The pretreatment I-PASS was pilot-tested in 118 treatment-naïve achalasia patients in the UK and Italy. Comprehension, completion time, acceptability, and correlation with the standard Eckardt score were assessed. All the patients completed the I-PASS. Most (96.5%) reported full comprehension, the median completion time was 10 minutes, and 98% expressed willingness to complete it again. The median I-PASS score was 29 (IQR 20-36), compared with a median Eckardt score of 7 (IQR 5-9). A strong correlation was observed between I-PASS and Eckardt (ρ = 0.68, P < 0.0001). Regression analysis confirmed that each one-point increase in Eckardt corresponded to a 3.1-point increase in I-PASS. The I-PASS questionnaire is feasible, well accepted, and provides a more comprehensive assessment of achalasia symptoms than the Eckardt score. Future studies will evaluate its reliability, responsiveness, and validity as a standardized PRO instrument.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSeverity of Illness IndexSymptom AssessmentAdultAgedChest PainDeglutition DisordersDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansItalyLaryngopharyngeal RefluxMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projectsachalasiabenign esophageal disorderpatient-reported outcome

Identifiers

PMID41378886
PMCPMC12696712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.