SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Exploring Communication Dynamics Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring Communication Dynamics Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Timeliness, Coordination, Clarity, and Kindness: Patients' Interpretations of Provider Actions as Indicators of Quality Cancer Care.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePatient-physician communication in oncology has been studied extensively. Most studies have focused on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) communication, showing the importance of a patient-centred approach. While some studies have explored the behaviours of patients and their relatives, the majority have centred on HCPs' behaviours, with much less attention to patients' communication patterns during consultations. The main objective of this systematic review was to examine how patients communicate and behave during oncology consultations and to identify the factors influencing these behaviours.
methodsFive databases were searched to find studies analyzing the communication patterns of patients and their relatives during oncology consultations that were audio- and/or video-recorded.
resultsBased on the 34,779 references identified, we included 47 studies in our review. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: (1) patients' communication patterns and the topics discussed during oncology consultations; (2) factors influencing patient communication; and (3) patients' perception of and satisfaction with the consultation.
conclusionsPatients exhibited active behaviours during consultations. However, many factors can influence interactions. We recommend taking a comprehensive approach that involves considering communication factors and supporting the development of patient-centred strategies tailored to individual patient needs. HCPs should not only practice patient-centred care; they should also implement specific actions to address patients' psychosocial needs. Future research should also utilize complex models to better understand the dynamics of patient-provider communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.