ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
An Imaging-Guided Neural Model Explains Lexical Stress Alteration in Acquired Apraxia of Speech.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction to "An Imaging-Guided Neural Model Explains Lexical Stress Alteration in Acquired Apraxia of Speech".Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- An Imaging-Guided Neural Model Explains Lexical Stress Alteration in Acquired Apraxia of Speech.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) is a disorder of speech motor planning/programming that is induced by a lesion to the left anterior ventral precentral sulcus. This study analyses neuroimaging data from AOS in order to propose and computationally test a mechanistic explanation of how the lesion leads to the characteristic of altered lexical stress in the disorder. Neuroimaging data from 31 participants with left hemisphere stroke (15 AOS) were reanalysed to guide a 'lesioned' version of the bilateral GODIVA neuro-computational model of speech production. Structural MRI and resting-state functional MRI measurements were used to decide the model's lesion extent and atypical neural processing, respectively. The 'lesioned' model was compared with a neurotypical model on the production of an exemplar utterance with different linguistic contexts. Analyses revealed the average lesion in the AOS participants extended over 22.25% of the left anterior ventral precentral sulcus. Functional connectivity in AOS was reduced between the lateral part of that region and the right motor cortex, as well as between the left and right motor cortices themselves. The version of the model that we altered in line with these findings produced lengthening of the second of two consecutive short syllables. The lengthened syllable was a word-initial unstressed syllable, and consequently, its contrastiveness with the adjacent stressed syllable of the word was reduced. The agreement between simulation results and previously reported acoustic measurements from actual AOS patients lends support to our mechanistic explanation. In conclusion, simulations of the GODIVA model provided empirical support for a mechanistic explanation indicating permanent sub-threshold cortical activity in AOS. As a result, the speech system becomes biased away from a motor control strategy based on motor programs and toward a strategy based on sensory feedback. This both lengthens brief syllables and interferes with the mechanism to shift between syllables, ultimately altering lexical stress. Analysis of the model's neural dynamics suggests the explanation can be generalised to various contexts where lexical stress is altered in AOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.