ArticleGut microbes2025
Cohort-specific determinants of donor strain engraftment following multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation in two randomised clinical trials.
Article in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome-based therapeutics forGut microbes · 2026Review
- Metagenome-scale modeling to assess microbiome metabolic complementarity for precision microbiota transplantation therapies.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial engraftment and immune regulation during fecal microbiota transplantation and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Metagenome-scale Modeling to Assess Microbiome Metabolic Complementarity for Precision Microbiota Transplantation Therapies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis: mucosal immune mechanisms and precision microbiota therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disrupted human gut microbiota have been associated with the development of certain disease states, including obesity and ulcerative colitis (UC). Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors is a promising avenue to shift the microbiome profile of the recipient towards that of the donor, potentially ameliorating related symptoms. Several recent meta-analyses have investigated the clinical and microbial determinants that influence the retention of transplanted donor microbial strains within the recipient gut microbiome following FMT (i.e. engraftment). However, the specific factors that affect donor strain engraftment in different disease states require further exploration. Here, we perform a strain engraftment analysis on data from two multi-donor FMT clinical trials: the Gut Bugs Trial for obesity and the FOCUS Trial for UC. Using donor strain matching, the donor-recipient pairings of the FOCUS Trial were first predicted in a blinded manner. The subsequent, unblinded, strain engraftment analysis of both datasets highlighted a differential effect of donor-recipient microbiome complementarity on engraftment across the two disease cohorts; greater engraftment efficiency was associated with increased donor-recipient microbial similarity in the FOCUS Trial, and decreased similarity in the Gut Bugs Trial, suggesting that the factors influencing engraftment may differ across disease cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.