Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378445›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2025

Cohort-specific determinants of donor strain engraftment following multi-donor faecal microbiota transplantation in two randomised clinical trials.

Anna H Behling, Theo Portlock, Daniel Ho, Brooke C Wilson, Sudarshan Paramsothy, Michael A Kamm, Wayne S Cutfield, Nadeem O Kaakoush, Justin M O'Sullivan, Tommi Vatanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna H BehlingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Theo PortlockLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Daniel HoLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Brooke C WilsonLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2213-542X
Sudarshan ParamsothyConcord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW , Australia.
Michael A KammDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic ​​​​​​, Australia.
Wayne S CutfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6107-3682
Nadeem O KaakoushSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-1077
Justin M O'SullivanLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2927-450X
Tommi VatanenLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-1291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disrupted human gut microbiota have been associated with the development of certain disease states, including obesity and ulcerative colitis (UC). Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors is a promising avenue to shift the microbiome profile of the recipient towards that of the donor, potentially ameliorating related symptoms. Several recent meta-analyses have investigated the clinical and microbial determinants that influence the retention of transplanted donor microbial strains within the recipient gut microbiome following FMT (i.e. engraftment). However, the specific factors that affect donor strain engraftment in different disease states require further exploration. Here, we perform a strain engraftment analysis on data from two multi-donor FMT clinical trials: the Gut Bugs Trial for obesity and the FOCUS Trial for UC. Using donor strain matching, the donor-recipient pairings of the FOCUS Trial were first predicted in a blinded manner. The subsequent, unblinded, strain engraftment analysis of both datasets highlighted a differential effect of donor-recipient microbiome complementarity on engraftment across the two disease cohorts; greater engraftment efficiency was associated with increased donor-recipient microbial similarity in the FOCUS Trial, and decreased similarity in the Gut Bugs Trial, suggesting that the factors influencing engraftment may differ across disease cohorts.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeFecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeObesityAdultBacteriaCohort StudiesFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTissue DonorsFaecal microbiota transplantationhuman gut microbiomeobesitystrain engraftmentulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID41378445
PMCPMC12710892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.