ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025
Exponentially increasing competition is exposing flaws in the current system of selection for specialty training.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professionalisation or Credentialism? Fifteen-Year Enrolment Trends in the UK Postgraduate Certificates in Medical Education.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competition to get into specialty training is increasingly exponentially, exposing issues with the current selection process. Flaws include biases in portfolio scoring matrices against those at financial disadvantage, incentivising application to multiple specialties, employing solely non-clinical criteria for selection for interview, and inappropriate use of the multi-specialty recruitment assessment. Increasing competition puts greater emphasis on these components in selection, with many potential negative ramifications. Efforts must now be made to address the flaws highlighted. We propose that this starts with incorporating clinical measures, such as multi-source feedback and clinical self-development activities, in portfolio scoring. However, an increased number of available training posts is what is ultimately needed to reduce the intense competition for jobs, take pressure off the current system, and allow its flaws to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.