ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Incorporating Dietary Information to Enhance Polygenic Prediction Models with Applications to Body Mass Index and Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic predictors can enhance screening for biomedical conditions, such as metabolism-related traits and diseases, but explain limited phenotypic variance and face implementation challenges in non-European populations. On the other hand, dietary quality and other sociocultural factors are well established metabolic risk factors that remain under-investigated in risk stratification models. In this study, we developed and evaluated risk stratification model combining polygenic predictors and diet-based models for body mass index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Using 5,368 Native Hawaiians from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC-NH) with genetic data, we integrated large-scale cross-ancestry GWAS summary statistics to develop polygenic score (PGS) models with better prediction accuracies (partial-R2 [SE] = 0.12 [0.04] for BMI; liability-R2 [SE] = 0.09 [0.04] for T2D) than using GWAS information from single ancestry (partial-R2 = 0.07-0.09 for BMI and liability-R2 = 0.05-0.07 for T2D) or in combination with GWAS from MEC-NH (partial-R2 = 0.05-0.06 for BMI and liability-R2 = 0.01-0.05 for T2D). Moreover, machine learning models trained on 520 dietary variables available from 14,346 MEC-NH individuals substantially explained BMI variation (partial-R2 [SE] = 0.12 [0.01]) and enhanced prediction when combined with PGS (adjusted-R2 = 0.29). The best performing diet score model for BMI was associated with multiple chronic diseases in the same cohort, potentially mediated via inflammatory and lipid pathways. Both PGS and dietary scores provided significant, complementary information for predicting BMI and T2D. For populations with limited genetic studies like Native Hawaiians, integrating external GWAS data or non-genetic dietary information can improve risk stratification models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.