ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable meta-learned hybrid CNN-transformer model with dual attention for leukemia diagnosis from peripheral blood smears.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of multiple deep learning models with mitigation-driven approaches for enhanced Alzheimer's disease classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep neural network architectures have transformed medical imaging, particularly in structural MRI (sMRI) classification. However, existing state-of-the-art deep learning models face limitations in preprocessing and feature extraction when classifying dementia-related conditions. This study addresses these challenges by evaluating multiple architectures for dementia diagnosis. Methods: This study assessed eight pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), a multimodal attention model, and a capsule network (CapsNet) for classifying three classes: dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls. The dataset, obtained from ADNI, was balanced across classes and comprised 10,000 training images per class, 3,000 validation images per class, and 850 test images per class. Classification was performed using 2D slices from sMRI scans. Performance metrics included accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Results: Among all evaluated models, the 3D-CNN and multimodal attention models achieved the highest performance, with accuracies of 84% and 86%, specificities of 83% and 86%, and sensitivities of 84% and 86%, respectively. The ViT and CapsNet models achieved 100% sensitivity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but demonstrated low precision for AD (43%) and 0% for other classes, indicating class imbalance effects. All models showed reduced performance and bias toward certain classes. Discussion: The findings highlight the limitations of current architectures in sMRI dementia classification, including suboptimal feature extraction and class-specific biases. While certain models, such as multimodal attention and 3D-CNN, performed better overall, precision and generalization remain challenges. Future work should focus on improved data representation through advanced computer vision methods and architectural modifications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.