Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Multi-model deep learning for dementia detection: addressing data and model limitations.

Areej Y Bayahya, Fares Jammal, Haneen Banjar, Fathy Elbouraey Eassa, Omar Talabay, Sultan H Alamri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Areej Y BayahyaComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Fares JammalDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Haneen BanjarComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Fathy Elbouraey EassaComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Omar TalabayFuture Artificial Intelligence Company (Humain), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan H AlamriDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deep neural network architectures have transformed medical imaging, particularly in structural MRI (sMRI) classification. However, existing state-of-the-art deep learning models face limitations in preprocessing and feature extraction when classifying dementia-related conditions. This study addresses these challenges by evaluating multiple architectures for dementia diagnosis. Methods: This study assessed eight pretrained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), a multimodal attention model, and a capsule network (CapsNet) for classifying three classes: dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls. The dataset, obtained from ADNI, was balanced across classes and comprised 10,000 training images per class, 3,000 validation images per class, and 850 test images per class. Classification was performed using 2D slices from sMRI scans. Performance metrics included accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Results: Among all evaluated models, the 3D-CNN and multimodal attention models achieved the highest performance, with accuracies of 84% and 86%, specificities of 83% and 86%, and sensitivities of 84% and 86%, respectively. The ViT and CapsNet models achieved 100% sensitivity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but demonstrated low precision for AD (43%) and 0% for other classes, indicating class imbalance effects. All models showed reduced performance and bias toward certain classes. Discussion: The findings highlight the limitations of current architectures in sMRI dementia classification, including suboptimal feature extraction and class-specific biases. While certain models, such as multimodal attention and 3D-CNN, performed better overall, precision and generalization remain challenges. Future work should focus on improved data representation through advanced computer vision methods and architectural modifications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and computational efficiency.

Indexed as

3D-CNNAIcaps networkCNNsdeep neural networkdementiaViTXAI

Identifiers

PMID41378346
PMCPMC12687559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.