ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2025
Strategies for automatic generation of information processing pathway maps.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information Processing Pathway Maps (IPPMs) are a concise way to represent the evidence for the transformation of information as it travels around the brain. However, their construction currently relies on hand-drawn maps from electrophysical recordings such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). This is both inefficient and contains an element of subjectivity. A better approach would be to automatically generate IPPMs from the data and objectively evaluate their accuracy. In this work, we propose a range of possible strategies and compare them to select the best. To this end, we (a) provide a test dataset against which automatic IPPM creation procedures can be evaluated; (b) suggest two novel evaluation metrics-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.