ArticleCureus2025
Optimizing Revision Lumbar Surgery: The Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Revision lumbar surgery is technically challenging due to postoperative scarring, altered anatomy, and high complication risks. Conventional open revisions cause more tissue damage and slower recovery. The Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) technique, offering improved visualization and maneuverability, may enhance safety and outcomes in revision procedures. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the UBE technique in managing complex lumbar revision surgeries. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted on 10 patients who underwent revision lumbar surgery using the UBE technique between February 2022 and February 2024. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Complications and patient satisfaction were also evaluated. Results Significant reductions in pain and disability were observed postoperatively. The mean preoperative VAS scores for leg and back pain decreased from 8.1 to 0.8 and from 7.5 to 1.7, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean ODI score improved from 67.5 to 17.5 (p < 0.001). No major complications occurred, and 70% of patients reported excellent satisfaction. Conclusion UBE is a safe and effective minimally invasive approach for complex lumbar revision surgeries. It provides substantial pain relief, functional recovery, and low complication rates. By preserving soft tissues and offering superior visualization, UBE shows promise as an advanced alternative to conventional revision techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.