ReviewCureus2025
Diagnostic and Surgical Planning Value of Computed Tomography (CT) in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankle fractures are common adult injuries with complex patterns often inadequately characterised by plain radiographs alone. Computed tomography (CT) has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy and inform surgical planning, though routine use remains limited due to cautious guidelines. This narrative review synthesises evidence from 20 unique studies (2010-2025) to compare CT with X-rays in adult ankle fractures and evaluate diagnostic precision, fracture classification, and changes in operative strategy. CT consistently enhanced the detection of complex and occult fractures, particularly posterior malleolar and syndesmotic injuries missed on X-rays, with fracture classification altered in up to 44% of cases and surgical management changed in approximately 25%, especially for tri-malleolar and posterior malleolus fractures. Despite these benefits, the evidence base is predominantly level III-IV, with limited data on cost-effectiveness or long-term functional outcomes. In alignment with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NG38 and the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (2023), the review concludes that while CT improves diagnostic and surgical decision-making for complex ankle fractures, its routine use lacks proven patient centred benefit; therefore, a selective CT algorithm is proposed to help clinicians identify fracture patterns where CT is most likely to influence management, balancing clinical value, cost, and radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.