ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Oral health indices and microbiota populations of adult cats consuming wet or dry diets.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral microbiota play a critical role in feline periodontal disease, with wet diets being associated with poor oral health. Because the oral microbial communities of cats remain underexplored, this study aimed to evaluate differences in the oral health indices and microbiota of cats fed a dry or wet diet. Twenty healthy adult cats had their teeth cleaned and polished. Cats were randomly allotted to a dry or wet diet and fed for 28 weeks. At that time, sulfur-containing compound concentrations and salivary pH were measured, plaque, calculus and gingivitis scores were assessed by a blinded veterinarian, and supragingival and subgingival plaque samples were collected for microbiota analysis. Microbiota data were evaluated using QIIME2. All other data were analyzed using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS. Cats fed the dry diet had lower tooth calculus coverage and thickness than cats fed the wet diet. Gingivitis scores were higher in cats fed the wet diet than those fed the dry diet. Other clinical measures did not differ. Bacterial alpha diversity measures on supragingival plaque were lower in cats fed the wet diet than those fed the dry diet. Bacterial beta diversity measures revealed distinct microbial communities between diet groups, with numerous changes to bacterial phyla and genera relative abundances. Compared with cats fed the dry diet, cats fed the wet diet had higher relative abundances of Bacteroidota and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.