ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Status and Influencing Factors of Dyadic Appraisals Differences Between Patients with COPD and Their Spousal Caregivers.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The dyadic management of COPD and the dyadic health status are profoundly affected by the dyadic appraisals of disease symptoms between patients and their caregivers. However, existing research has not adequately explored the discrepancies in these dyadic appraisals or their underlying determinants. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between February and March 2025 using convenience sampling. A total of 142 pairs of clinically stable patients with COPD and their spousal caregivers were recruited from the Department of Pulmonary Diseases at a tertiary Grade A hospital of traditional Chinese medicine in Jiangsu Province. Data were collected using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Mutuality Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Self-Concealment Scale, and a general information questionnaire. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis, and linear regression was employed to identify the factors influencing the differences in symptom appraisal. Results: High consistency was observed in the appraisals of physical symptom subscale score, total MSAS score, and global distress index by patients with COPD and their caregivers. However, the patients' score was higher than their caregivers' score as it came to the appraisals of psychological symptoms (patients' score: median, 0.33 [IQR, 0.00-0.50]; caregivers' score: median, 0.17 [IQR, 0.00-0.44]; Conclusion: To decrease differences in the appraisal of psychological symptoms between the two parties and to advance the practice and development of the COPD care model, healthcare professionals should focus on the way patients and caregivers share about psychological states and fortify the structure of the caregiver support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.