ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Developing a Nomogram Prediction Model for Dietary Behavior Adherence in Hemodialysis Patients.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Predictors of Nonadherence to Treatment in Adult Patients Undergoing In-Centre Haemodialysis in Public Dialysis Units: A Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a nomogram prediction model for dietary behavior adherence in hemodialysis (HD) patients, providing a simple and accurate tool for individualized risk prediction and supporting effective intervention strategies. Methods: A total of 236 HD patients admitted from January 2022 to January 2024 were retrospectively included as the modeling group, and another 121 HD patients admitted from January 2024 to May 2025 served as the validation group. Patients in both groups were classified into compliance and non-compliance groups according to their dietary adherence. Lasso regression and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify independent predictors and construct the nomogram. Internal and external validation were performed using ROC curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among the 236 patients in the modeling group, 73 (30.93%) showed dietary non-compliance. Age, years on dialysis, educational level, dietary knowledge, social support, family support, and self-care ability significantly differed between the two groups (P<0.05). Seven variables selected by Lasso regression were entered into logistic analysis. Age, years on dialysis, and poor self-care ability were risk factors for non-adherence, whereas higher educational level, better dietary knowledge, stronger social support, and family support were protective factors (P<0.05). The internal validation yielded an AUC of 0.884 and an H-L χ Conclusion: Age, years on dialysis, educational level, dietary knowledge, social support, family support, and self-care ability are key factors influencing dietary adherence in HD patients. The nomogram based on these variables demonstrated good discrimination and clinical benefit, aiding early identification of high-risk patients and supporting individualized dietary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.