ArticleJB & JS open access
Patient Preferences When Selecting Their Total Joint Arthroplasty Surgeon: A Multicenter Survey Study.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgeon selection can influence patient satisfaction, outcomes, and access in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Awareness of patient preferences enables practices to enhance trust, optimize communication, and improve adherence. While referrals and word-of-mouth recommendations often outweigh online marketing, prospective multicenter research exploring how patients choose their TJA surgeon is limited. The aim of this study was to identify key decision-making factors and how they vary by demographics. Methods: This prospective, multicenter cross-sectional survey study included patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty at 4 high-volume institutions from January 2024 to 2025. Participants completed a survey on surgeon selection, including how they first heard of the surgeon, number of visits before deciding on surgery, and whether other surgeons were consulted. Patients rated 10 factors (1-10 scale) and selected the top 3 most important ones from a list of 7 factors. Results: Among 808 participants, most selected their surgeon through referrals (44.9%) or word-of-mouth recommendations (18.7%); only 8.4% cited online advertisements. Female patients rated surgeon gender (p = 0.010), ease of communication (p = 0.036), and time spent (P = 0.008) as more important than male patients. Minority patients prioritized gender (p = 0.003), race (p < 0.001), bedside manners (p = 0.013), time spent (p = 0.045), and implant type used (p = 0.004) more than White patients. Patients with a median household income between $30,000 and $70,000 rated insurance acceptance higher than those with household income higher than $300,000 (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Patients choose their arthroplasty surgeon primarily by way of referrals and word-of-mouth recommendations, underscoring the importance of trust. Female and minority patients value surgeon gender, race, and interpersonal skills, supporting culturally responsive care. Strengthening primary care physician engagement and community outreach may improve trust and promote equitable access.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.