ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
DMAGCL: A dual-masked adaptive graph contrastive learning framework for predicting circRNA-drug sensitivity.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Advances in circRNA research: disease associations and diagnostic innovations.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a unique class of non-coding RNAs with stable covalently closed structures that play key regulatory roles in gene expression and drug response. However, experimental identification of circRNA-drug sensitivity remains labor-intensive. To overcome these limitations, we introduce DMAGCL, a Dual-Masked Graph Contrastive Learning framework, whose core innovations include: (1) a synergistic dual-masking strategy (path- and edge-level) that forces the model to learn robust representations against both macro-level path disruptions and micro-level edge noise; (2) an adaptive contrastive loss with a scheduled temperature parameter (t) to dynamically balance exploration and exploitation during training; and (3) an attention-based fusion classifier (AFC) that explicitly models complex cross-modal interactions between circRNA sequences and drug molecular graphs for adaptive multi-source information fusion. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that DMAGCL achieves state-of-the-art performance, attaining an average AUC of 0.8940 and AUPR of 0.9006 under five-fold cross-validation, and a slightly higher average AUC of 0.8982 under the more stringent ten-fold cross-validation, consistently surpassing strong baselines including GATECDA and MNGACDA. This performance advantage stems from our core design choices, as evidenced by systematic ablation studies confirming the indispensable and complementary roles of the dual-masking strategy and the effectiveness of the adaptive loss and fusion classifier. Case studies on four representative anticancer drugs (doxorubicin, gefitinib, sorafenib, and paclitaxel) achieved an average experimental validation rate of 80%, highlighting the framework's predictive reliability and biological relevance. In conclusion, this study makes three primary contributions: (1) it introduces the novel DMAGCL framework, establishing a new paradigm for circRNA-drug association prediction via its synergistic dual-masking, adaptive learning, and attentive fusion components; (2) it delivers a highly robust and interpretable model with validated predictive reliability through extensive experiments and case studies (80% average validation rate); and (3) it provides a scalable computational tool that offers valuable insights for discovering novel circRNA-drug associations, understanding drug resistance mechanisms, and informing precision therapy design, with clear pathways for extension to other biological interaction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.