ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Macromolecular crystallography for mammalian body temperature in support of molecular biophysics methods.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alphafuser: a parsimonious approach to predicting higher-order protein complexes.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Towards patient-relevant structures: reviewing body-temperature biological macromolecules and their ligands for pharmaceutical applications.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Review
- Biophysics in Great Britain and Ireland.Biophysical reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review describes various molecular biophysics methods (crystallography, mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM), free electron laser and X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy) which can be used to investigate the molecular structure of proteins under diverse conditions (visually summarised in the thumbnail image for the journal contents pages). We focus particularly on those which permit for the incubation and/or experimental sample analysis at mammalian body temperature (37 °C) or at physiological conditions for yet higher temperatures such as thermophiles. Crystallography, a leading method in structure elucidation, in recent decades has been dominated by structures analysed at cryogenic temperatures to ensure best resolution and crystal stability under X-ray irradiation. However, it raises the question-is the atomic structure elucidated by cryo-crystal structures truly representative of processes occurring at body temperature? This is surely an important requirement for protein-ligand binding investigations for drug discovery as protein binding may vary with temperature and indicate key aspects that could be overlooked. A review of wwPDB submissions versus sample temperature analysis clearly indicates a marked lack of atomic data obtained at 37 °C. This is not to say that 100 K cryo-crystallography ought to be replaced, in such structure-based drug discovery which is highly efficiently implemented at many macromolecular crystallographic beamlines worldwide, but favoured ligand binding events in particular for lead compounds from those surveys may provide additional valued data when studied at 37 °C. Graphical abstract: Thumbnail contents image: Molecular biophysics methods suitable for the analysis of macromolecules at body temperatures or higher. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12551-025-01328-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.