Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378116›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Modular protein frameworks via supramolecular synthons.

Niamh M Mockler, Peter B Crowley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niamh M MocklerSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33 Ireland.
Peter B CrowleySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33 Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled protein assembly and protein crystal engineering are routes to new types of biomaterials. In this review, we examine how crystal engineering concepts, including polymorph searching, molecular tectonics and supramolecular synthons, can be adapted and applied in protein-based systems. We explore 'mix-and-match' approaches, as established with modular frameworks that combine interchangeable components. We review the numerous current methodologies in protein assembly and crystal engineering from (de novo) designed proteins to metal-mediated or ligand-mediated strategies. Commercially available synthetic receptors such as macrocycles are useful protein assembly mediators and are advantageous in their applicability to diverse protein targets. We highlight the use of calixarenes, cucurbiturils and proteins as building blocks (tectons), showing that reproducible inter-tecton structural units (synthons) have applications in directing protein assembly and crystal engineering.

Indexed as

Affinity tagCrystal engineeringMacrocycleProtein assemblyRecognition

Identifiers

PMID41378116
PMCPMC12686331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.