Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378106›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Recent progress in probing small molecule interactions with DNA.

Simon Poole, Bríonna McGorman, Christine J Cardin, Andrew Kellett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DNA-Binding Properties of Iridium(III) Complexes Encompassing Design, Function and Biophysical Assessments.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon Poole *School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2242-6518
Bríonna McGorman *School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-9639
Christine J CardinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AD UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2556-9995
Andrew KellettSchool of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8947-1401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acids are primary therapeutic targets, and understanding drug-DNA interactions is essential to the discovery of new clinical agents. In recent years, the desire to develop therapies with specific biological targets has produced new molecules that preferentially interact with complex nucleic acid sequences and structures. As such, the targeting of non-canonical nucleic acids, including DNA triplexes, G-quadruplexes, i-motifs, three-way junctions and Holliday junctions, have emerged due to their roles in gene regulation, genome stability and cellular stress responses. Characterising the interactions of these non-canonical structures with new ligands and metal complexes has led to the discovery of promising agents with therapeutic potential. Biophysical techniques including spectroscopic methods, crystallography and biomolecular assays have been critical to probing these interactions. This review describes recent advancements in the analysis of higher-order drug-DNA interactions for the rational design of targeted therapeutics.

Indexed as

B-DNADNADrug-DNA interactionsHolliday junctionNon-canonical DNANucleic acidsThree-way junctionTriple helixTriplex-forming oligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID41378106
PMCPMC12686254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.