Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378073›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Balancing act: Tapering mycophenolate mofetil in immune checkpoint inhibitor hepatitis-strategies, outcomes, and risks.

Sahaj Mujumdar, Sofia Shaikh, Shu-Yen Chan, Anuroop Yekula, Daniel R Weinberg, Nida S Ansari, David Jerez Diaz, Sarah B McPherson, Mark Levstik, Andrew M Moon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sahaj MujumdarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Sofia ShaikhDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Shu-Yen ChanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232.
Anuroop YekulaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Daniel R WeinbergDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Nida S AnsariInternal Medicine, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ 07504, United States.
David Jerez DiazInternal Medicine, Florida State University, Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States.
Sarah B McPhersonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Mark LevstikDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States.
Andrew M MoonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27713, United States.
Patrick TwohigDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14682, United States. patrick_twohig@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy but are associated with immune-related adverse events, including ICIs hepatitis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used as a second-line immunosuppressive agent for steroid-refractory cases. However, there is no standardized approach to MMF tapering, leading to uncertainties regarding relapse risk, optimal tapering strategies, and long-term outcomes.

aimTo evaluate current evidence on MMF tapering in ICI hepatitis, focusing on strategies, clinical outcomes, and the risk of hepatitis recurrence. Additionally, we explore the feasibility of reintroducing ICI therapy after immunosuppression withdrawal.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and clinical trial registries to identify studies reporting MMF use and tapering strategies in ICI hepatitis. We extracted data from manuscripts including patient characteristics, MMF dosing regimens, tapering duration, relapse rates, and oncologic outcomes. Risk factors for recurrence and successful tapering were analyzed.

resultsThere was significant heterogeneity in the duration of MMF taper, which ranged from 4 weeks to greater than 6 months. The tapering schedules presented were individualized based on the severity of liver injury, patient response to treatment, and risk factors for relapse. We summarize current tapering approaches, including rapid

conclusionWhile MMF is effective in managing ICI hepatitis, tapering remains a clinical challenge with potential risks of hepatitis flare and disease progression. Standardized tapering protocols are needed to optimize immunosuppression while preserving anticancer efficacy. Future studies should focus on biomarker-driven tapering strategies and prospective trials to establish best practices.

Indexed as

Cancer immunotherapyHepatotoxicityImmune checkpoint inhibitor hepatitisImmune-related adverse eventsimmunosuppressionMycophenolate mofetilTapering

Identifiers

PMID41378073
PMCPMC12687012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.