ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Circulating tumor cells as a recurrence risk marker in glioma: a retrospective study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioma is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a poor prognosis due to its infiltrative nature and frequent recurrence. Current treatments often fail to achieve long-term remission, partly because of the lack of effective biomarkers for early detection and recurrence prediction. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as potential biomarkers in various cancers, but research on CTC detection in glioma is relatively limited, and its clinical application remains in the exploratory phase. This study aimed to characterize peripheral blood CTC as a biological biomarker for recurrence risk in glioma, laying the groundwork for prospective validation. Methods: CTCs were isolated, identified, and quantified using the CanPatrol technique in 27 patients with glioma and 10 benign brain lesion controls. The relationship between CTCs and World Health Organization (WHO) grade, as well as glioma recurrence, was analyzed based on the expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers. Results: The positive rate of CTCs was higher in patients with high-grade glioma (WHO grade III-IV) than in those with low-grade glioma (WHO grade I-II). The positive rate of CTCs in patients with high Ki-67 expression in primary tumor tissues was significantly higher than in those with low Ki-67 expression (P=0.01). Additionally, CTC-positive cases showed a recurrence rate of 93% (14/15) versus 63% (5/8) in CTC-negative cases (P=0.10). Univariate analysis identified both high Ki-67 (P=0.001) and WHO grade III-IV (P=0.002) as significant predictors of recurrence. Conclusions: The level of CTCs in the peripheral blood of patients with brain glioma is significantly correlated with both the WHO grade of tumor histology and Ki-67 expression levels. The detection of CTCs, WHO grade, and Ki-67 expression levels may have potential clinical value in predicting glioma recurrence, but prospective validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.