ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Association between cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2023 and Mendelian randomization analyses.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cholecystectomy-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis promotes colorectal carcinogenesis: from epidemiological controversy to FXR-centered mechanistic insights.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cholecystectomy is widely used to treat gallbladder disease, but its link to colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the association between cholecystectomy and CRC by combining cross-sectional analysis with Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods: We analyzed 12,490 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2023 for the association between cholecystectomy and CRC. Weighted logistic regression models with progressive adjustments were applied: Model 1 was unadjusted, Model 2 accounted for sociodemographic factors, while Model 3 was further controlled for lifestyle, diet, and comorbidities. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the results' robustness. MR analysis further complemented the observational analysis and evaluated potential causality. Results: In the NHANES sample, cholecystectomy was not significantly associated with CRC after full adjustment [Model 3: odds ratio (OR) =2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-4.55; P=0.07], although crude and partially adjusted models showed positive associations (Model 1: OR =3.77, 95% CI: 2.08-6.83, P<0.001; Model 2: OR =2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.51, P=0.01). The association remained non-significant across multiple sensitivity analyses and was consistent across population subgroups. MR analysis further indicated no causal link between cholecystectomy and CRC risk. Conclusions: No statistically significant overall association was observed between cholecystectomy and CRC in our analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.