ArticleResearch square2025
Leveraging Language Models for Automated Label Generation in Traumatic Brain Injury Radiology Reports.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Timely interpretation of head CT scans is critical for managing traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet delays in radiology reporting can slow urgent clinical decisions. To address this challenge, we developed natural language processing (NLP) frameworks that automatically convert free-text radiology reports into structured, machine-readable findings. Using 4,038 de-identified head CT reports, including 444 expert-annotated samples, we compared several strategies for improving clinical finding and location model accuracy. A lexicon-weighted domain-adaptive pretraining approach, designed to emphasize key diseased-related terms, achieved the best overall performance, reaching a weighted F1-score of 0.92 across five-fold cross-validation. A location-aware cascade model further improved recognition of anatomical sites, enhancing transparency and clinical relevance. Semi-supervised learning using unlabeled reports produced moderate gains over standard supervised models. These methods demonstrate that domain-specific adaptation and structured modeling can reliably extract critical findings from radiology text, enabling faster, more consistent interpretation of radiology reports. By enabling automated report generation from imaging and multimodal data, this framework may help shorten reporting turnaround times and facilitate more data-driven neurotrauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.