ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Personal Sleep Wellness.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As sleep health becomes increasingly central to personal well-being, individuals are turning to digital tools for education, tracking, and behavior change support. Large language models like ChatGPT and Gemini have recently emerged as promising components of these tools, capable of generating personalized, conversational, and context-aware sleep guidance. This scoping survey synthesizes findings from 21 papers that explore the use of large language models in nonclinical, everyday user-focused applications for sleep health. We organize the literature into 4 core use cases: educational question answering, condition-specific support (eg, obstructive sleep apnea), personalized recommendations and coaching, and cognitive behavioral therapy-based self-help systems. We analyze the diverse data sources involved-including wearable sensor data, self-reported metrics, and synthetic benchmarks-as well as model architectures, fine-tuning techniques, and personalization strategies. Finally, we examine evaluation frameworks ranging from expert review to pilot user studies and LLM-based scoring. The review highlights current capabilities, methodological challenges, and open opportunities for advancing trustworthy, personalized sleep support using generative artificial intelligence, while emphasizing that much of the evidence remains preliminary, often short-term, expert-rated, or proxy-based, which limits external validity and generalizability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.