Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377859›Full record

ArticleZoological studies2025

A Systematic Review of Species Classification Using Deep Learning Algorithms and Gender Identification of

Anurupa Mistry, Chetas Hedaoo, Archana Sharbidre, Jayashri Bagade, Sangeeta V Pandit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anurupa MistryDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: anurupamistry@gmail.com (Mistry).
Chetas HedaooDepartment of Electronics and telecommunication, Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: chetas.22111109@viit.ac.in (Hedaoo).
Archana SharbidreDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: aasharbidre@unipune.ac.in (Sharbidre).
Jayashri BagadeDepartment of Information Technology, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: jayashrihedaoo@rediffmail.com (Bagade).
Sangeeta V PanditDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: drpanditsv@unipune.ac.in (Pandit).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) constitutes a division of artificial intelligence (AI) that aims to train computers how to perform specific tasks without explicit programming. Traditional ML tools are widely used for classification and identification of animals. However, these methods have some drawbacks because of the extensive manual reliance and the delay in data interpretation. To overcome this, Applied Deep Learning algorithms are used with Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models introduced to address species classification, characteristics detection, and pattern recognition tasks helping in accurate identification and classification of animals. In this paper, we have tried to compile and deliver a recent comprehensive information on latest available investigations in the field of life sciences particularly used for animal identification. We have also accentuated the diverse applications of machine learning models including other parameters like, features, accuracy gained, database used and their limitations. The red flour beetle,

Indexed as

CastaneumCNNDeep learningGender identificationSpecies classificationTribolium

Identifiers

PMID41377859
PMCPMC12686942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.