Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377855›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2025

Temporally parallel facilitation of same-colored objects beyond spatial selection.

S Wehle, C Gundlach, M M Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S WehleExperimental Psychology and Methods, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
C GundlachExperimental Psychology and Methods, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
M M MüllerExperimental Psychology and Methods, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a probabilistic spatial cueing experiment, we cued one out of four objects/arcs that were arranged in a circle to test whether the cued arc/object would result in strictly object-based processing restricting facilitation of features to the cued object, or whether we observe global feature-based spread across object boundaries. Four arcs flickered at different frequencies, respectively, to evoke steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), allowing to investigate neural temporal dynamics in the early visual cortex following the presentation of the spatial cue. Initially, all arcs had identical colors and with spatial cue onset switched to a specific color configuration. In one configuration, one uncued arc had the same color as the cued one. We found global feature-based spread to same-colored elements across object boundaries in SSVEPs and behavioral responses. Once spatial attention was shifted to the cued location/arc, SSVEP amplitudes elicited by the cued arc and the same-colored uncued arc showed a temporally overlapping increase early after the spatial cue. Importantly, color processing was not required to perform the task, indicating that global feature-based spread occurs automatically, independent of task demands.

Indexed as

Attentional shiftsElectroencephalography (EEG)Feature processingObject processingSpatial cueingSteady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP)Visual attentionVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID41377855
PMCPMC12689214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.