ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Universal medical image segmentation via in-context cross-attention.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semantic segmentation is critical in medical image processing, with traditional specialist models facing adaptation challenges to new tasks or distribution shifts. While both generalist pre-trained models and universal segmentation approaches have emerged as solutions, universal methods offer advantages in versatility, sample efficiency, and integration ease into annotation pipelines. We introduce a novel universal segmentation method based on the premise that pre-selecting relevant regions from support sets improves segmentation accuracy. Our approach implements cross-attention between query images and support set images, coupled with an innovative attention up-scaling mechanism that efficiently computes cross-attention on small-scale features with upscaling to higher resolutions. The design inherently supports explainability by allowing inspection of relevant support set locations for each input region. Extensive evaluation across 29 medical datasets spanning 9 imaging modalities and 135 segmentation tasks demonstrates consistent performance improvements, even with lightweight models. Our experiments show proportional gains in segmentation performance as support set size increases, with the cross-attention mechanism effectively selecting the most relevant support images from larger annotation pools. Additionally, our explainability module demonstrates competitive or improved interpretability when compared to established methods like LayerCAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.