ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Intraoperative computed tomography guided navigation for atlantoaxial screw placement: Accuracy and safety analysis.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atlantoaxial stabilization is indicated for traumatic or degenerative pathologies. The procedure is technically demanding due to delicate neurovascular anatomy and narrow bone corridors. Recent technologies such as neuronavigation and intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) may improve screw placement and reduce complications. This study reports our experience with C1-C2 stabilization using these tools. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 15 consecutive patients who underwent C1-C2 stabilization. Clinical assessment was performed pre- and postoperatively using the Neck Disability Index and American Spinal Injury Association score. Fractures were classified using standard parameters; degenerative cases were assessed with positional magnetic resonance imaging. Other data collected included pathology, surgical technique, sagittal/coronal alignment, complications, and follow-up duration. All surgeries used iCT for navigation and intraoperative control. Screw accuracy was assessed with a modified Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Results: Mean patient age was 63 years. Indications were traumatic (47%) or degenerative (53%). Screws were placed into C1-C2 lateral masses. Of 60 screws, 54 were grade A and 6 were grade B. One case required recalibration due to neuronavigation inaccuracy. Alignment was restored in all cases. Thirteen patients showed significant clinical improvement. Mean follow-up was 12 months, with no complications recorded. Conclusions: Neuronavigation with iCT for C1-C2 screw placement proved safe and accurate. Our data show 90% grade A and 10% grade B screws, with a mean deviation of 0.13 mm and no intra-or postoperative complications attributable to the technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.