ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Evaluating accuracy in robotic-assisted thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement: Insights from a single-center study of 410 patients.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: A single-center prospective study evaluating the accuracy and factors influencing robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. Objectives: To assess the accuracy of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar spine surgeries and to analyze the factors that enhance or hinder the precision of robotic systems in a single-center setting. Summary of Background Data: Robotic systems are significant advancement in spinal surgery, offering added advantage in pedicle screw placement compared to conventional methods such as freehand, fluoroscopy-guided, and computer-aided navigation (CAN)-guided techniques. Robots combine CAN with a stable mechanical arm, ensuring accurate placement along preplanned trajectories, particularly advantageous in complex anatomies. Methods: A total of 410 patients who underwent robotic-assisted thoracolumbar spine surgery were included in the study. Pedicle screws were placed with robotic assistance using an optimized workflow. Screw placement accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, with screws graded A and B considered clinically acceptable. Results: Of the 2600 screws placed, 99.2% were clinically acceptable (93.4% Grade A and 5.8% Grade B), with only 0.8% exhibiting breaches requiring revision. Lateral breaches were the most common (59.1%). Robotic system usage averaged 20.6 min, with an average time of 3.8 min per screw insertion. Postoperative outcomes included a mean Visual Analog Scale pain score of 7.3 and an average hospital stay of 4.7 days. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement using the Mazor X system demonstrated high accuracy and minimal revision rates. Robotic integration reduces complications and streamlines workflows, improving patient safety and advancing spine surgery standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.