ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
National trends in post-operative complications for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty from 2012 to 2022.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. While ACDF remains the gold standard, CDA is gaining popularity due to the benefit of motion preservation. However, national trends in outcomes between these procedures remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients aged >18 who underwent ACDF or CDA between 2012 and 2022, using CPT codes 22551 and 22856. Annual rates of demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications were analyzed. Univariate analysis evaluated outcomes including readmission, reoperation, and length of stay (LOS). Results: We identified 93,989 ACDF and 8708 CDA patients. From 2012 to 2022, the proportion of ACDF cases declined from 96.3% to 90.2%, while CDA cases increased from 3.7% to 9.9%. ACDF patients were older (55.7 vs. 46.8 years) and had higher body mass index (30.6 vs. 29.6) ( Conclusion: CDA continues to show favorable short-term outcomes compared to ACDF but remains less utilized overall. These trends may guide surgical planning and patient counseling in cervical spine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.