Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Primary rectal ectopic pregnancy: a rare case report and literature review.

Qun Zhang, WenJie Yang, BoWei Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qun ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Norman Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
WenJie YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Norman Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
BoWei WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Norman Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rectal ectopic pregnancy is classified into primary and secondary types, with primary rectal ectopic pregnancy being one of the rarest forms of extrauterine gestation. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. Case presentation: We present a case of primary rectal ectopic pregnancy in a 37-year-old woman with acute abdominal pain and massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Under the premise of gynecological ultrasound suggesting conventional tubal or ovarian ectopic pregnancy, we employed diagnostic single-port laparoscopy to exclude typical adnexal pregnancies. Through comprehensive exploration of both the upper and lower abdominal cavities, we ultimately confirmed the diagnosis of primary rectal ectopic pregnancy. And through coordinated efforts with gastrointestinal surgeons, we performed precise resection of the ectopic gestational tissue while preserving rectal integrity, with prompt control of intra-abdominal hemorrhage. This emergency intervention achieved dual success: lifesaving management coupled with minimally invasive advantages, Enhanced recovery after surgery and resulting in a nearly invisible umbilical incision with optimal cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion: Patients with rectal ectopic pregnancy often present with nonspecific early symptoms, leading to frequent misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Definitive diagnosis is typically established only after the onset of severe complications. Through a multidisciplinary approach to this rare case and a systematic review of the literature, we have derived the following important clinical insights: 1. Early diagnosis strategy: early identification of REP requires a multimodal approach, including dynamic monitoring of serum β-hCG levels, pelvic ultrasound, and multimodal imaging assessment with CT/MRI. Diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed when necessary to confirm the location and extent of the lesion. 2. Broadening differential diagnosis considerations: in all women of childbearing age who are considered to be pregnant, especially when intrauterine, tubal, or ovarian pregnancy is not detected by ultrasound, REP should be included in the differential diagnosis. 3. Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Single-port laparoscopic surgery has demonstrated comprehensive advantages in such emergency surgeries, including minimal invasiveness, rapid recovery, and cosmetic benefits. However, this technique requires the surgeon to possess advanced skills, and the patient must meet the indications for single-port laparoscopic surgery. This article also provides important reference evidence for the development of standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols for rectal ectopic pregnancy.

Indexed as

diagnosisextrauterine pregnancyrare implantationrectal ectopic pregnancytreatment

Identifiers

PMID41377814
PMCPMC12685859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.