ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Potentially inappropriate medications for patients with heart failure: a nationwide retrospective study from 2012 to 2022.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the population ages, addressing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for patients with heart failure (HF) is extremely important, and many medical professionals are working on this issue. However, it is unclear whether the various PIM countermeasures being implemented throughout Japan are leading to the suppression of PIMs for patients with HF. The characteristics of hospitalised patients with HF and prescription patterns of PIMs over the past decade were investigated. Method: Data from the Japanese Cardiovascular Disease Registry Database and the Diagnostic Procedure Combination Database of 1,452,034 inpatients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HF between April 2012 and March 2022 were analysed. The study was stratified into three periods: 2012-2015, 2016-2019, and 2020-2022. Results: Typical PIMs, such as benzodiazepine, anxiolytics medications, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidine, sulfonylurea, non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, digoxin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticholinergics, and β2 agonists showed decreased prescription trends over the years (P for all trends <0.01). Inpatient PIM prescriptions rarely continued at discharge. Conclusion: These results suggest that typical PIMs for hospitalised patients with HF have declined during the past decade. Medical providers should contribute to optimising medications that minimise PIM administration to patients with HF. In the future, PIMs for patients with HF may need to be monitored as a safety indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.