ArticleOTO open
Limited Utility of Existing Hearing Loss Panels in the Assessment of Early-Onset, Bilateral Meniere's Disease.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: While the etiology of Meniere's disease (MD) is likely multifactorial, genetics are thought to play a role. Several previous studies have yielded inconclusive results, potentially due to phenotypic uncertainty and variable diagnostic criteria. To explore potential genetic bases in a more rigorous context, we assessed the clinical predictors and diagnostic yield of current hearing loss panels in a highly curated cohort of patients with bilateral and/or early-onset MD. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Multidisciplinary tertiary care hearing loss genetics clinic. Methods: Data from clinical notes, audiograms, and genetic reports of adult patients diagnosed with bilateral and/or early-onset (<40 years) MD from October 2019 to June 2025 were analyzed with logistic regression and summary statistics to determine predictive factors and diagnostic yields of existing genetic panels. Results: Of the 37 patients analyzed (mean age 47.7 + 14.5 years, 54% male), 24 (64.8%) had early-onset MD, 22 (59.5%) had bilateral MD, and 9 (24.3%) had both. Moderately severe to profound hearing loss prior to 65 was significantly associated with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPV) (OR 8.98 [1.17, 101]; Conclusions: Current hearing loss panels show limited diagnostic utility for MD. Future research should prioritize whole genome sequencing to identify novel MD-associated loci and provide guidance to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.